Reporting and evaluating genetic association studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Commentary Reporting and evaluating genetic association studies
Genetic association studies have become an important part of our scientific landscape. This commentary discusses some basic scientific issues which should be considered when reporting and evaluating such studies including SNP Discovery, Genotyping and Haplotype Analysis; Population Size, Matching of Cases and Controls, and Population Stratification; Phenotype Definition and Multiple Related Phe...
متن کاملReporting and evaluating genetic association studies
Genetic association studies have become an important part of our scientific landscape. This commentary discusses some basic scientific issues which should be considered when reporting and evaluating such studies including SNP Discovery, Genotyping and Haplotype Analysis; Population Size, Matching of Cases and Controls, and Population Stratification; Phenotype Definition and Multiple Related Phe...
متن کاملBias in Reporting of Genetic Association Studies
Carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes may have particularly interesting roles in the honey bee, Apis mellifera , because this social insect has an extremely carbohydrate-rich diet, and nutrition plays important roles in caste determination and socially mediated behavioural plasticity. We annotated a total of 174 genes encoding carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes and 28 genes encoding lipid-metabolizi...
متن کاملReporting genetic association studies: the STREGA statement.
98 www.thelancet.com Vol 374 July 11, 2009 The balance of safety and effi cacy in today’s study is encouraging, but it is impossible to draw defi nitive clinical conclusions from such a phase II study. Experience with muraglitazar has shown that a good lipid and blood glucose profi le is not suffi cient to predict clinical outcomes. It is a strength that cardiovascular events, including heart f...
متن کاملReporting of Systematic Reviews: The Challenge of Genetic Association Studies
Muin J. Khoury, Julian Little, Julian Higgins, John P. A. Ioannidis, Marta Gwinn We applaud PLoS editors for their commitment to publishing high-quality systematic reviews (SRs) [1]. Moher et al. [2] clearly documented the inconsistent quality of reporting of SRs. With more than 2,500 SRs published every year, low-quality or outdated reviews may mislead researchers, providers, and policy makers...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Respiratory Research
سال: 2009
ISSN: 1465-993X
DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-10-109